Comments on: Abortion in the Bible? http://jdallen.org/politics/abortion-in-the-bible/ "To Bigotry No Sanction, To Persecution No Assistance" Fri, 05 Feb 2010 09:49:34 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: marie aka the FertilityBitch http://jdallen.org/politics/abortion-in-the-bible/comment-page-1/#comment-682 marie aka the FertilityBitch Tue, 29 Aug 2006 20:54:12 +0000 http://jdallen.org/politics/abortion-in-the-bible/#comment-682 Yeeek. All I keep thinking: what's IN that water! Yeeek. All I keep thinking: what’s IN that water!

]]> By: James Allen http://jdallen.org/politics/abortion-in-the-bible/comment-page-1/#comment-680 James Allen Mon, 28 Aug 2006 19:36:26 +0000 http://jdallen.org/politics/abortion-in-the-bible/#comment-680 The version of the NIV I looked at had this translation as an explanatory footnote. If you go the site that I linked to, you can also view the NIV version, and it has that same footnote. The version of the NIV I looked at had this translation as an explanatory footnote. If you go the site that I linked to, you can also view the NIV version, and it has that same footnote.

]]> By: Phil http://jdallen.org/politics/abortion-in-the-bible/comment-page-1/#comment-679 Phil Mon, 28 Aug 2006 19:33:24 +0000 http://jdallen.org/politics/abortion-in-the-bible/#comment-679 The New International Version doesn't say anything about the womb miscarrying. It talks about the woman's thigh wasting away instead, for some reason. Wonder what led to the difference in translation? The New International Version doesn’t say anything about the womb miscarrying. It talks about the woman’s thigh wasting away instead, for some reason. Wonder what led to the difference in translation?

]]> By: Snake http://jdallen.org/politics/abortion-in-the-bible/comment-page-1/#comment-677 Snake Mon, 28 Aug 2006 18:03:31 +0000 http://jdallen.org/politics/abortion-in-the-bible/#comment-677 You have to remember the context. The bible was written by about a dozen different MEN at different points in history all following different agendas. The only thing they have in common, is that they all wanted to keep women "in their place" (as repugnant as that may sound). You have to remember the context. The bible was written by about a dozen different MEN at different points in history all following different agendas. The only thing they have in common, is that they all wanted to keep women “in their place” (as repugnant as that may sound).

]]> By: Angie http://jdallen.org/politics/abortion-in-the-bible/comment-page-1/#comment-676 Angie Mon, 28 Aug 2006 17:28:30 +0000 http://jdallen.org/politics/abortion-in-the-bible/#comment-676 Ah ... so their bible approves abortion. Very interesting. <i>or if he is jealous and suspects her even though she is not impure</i> So even if she has done NO wrong, there is no proof, she's still treated as if she's guilty. Due to his insecurities. And if the wife suspects he has been unfaithful? What course of action is she allowed? Ah … so their bible approves abortion. Very interesting.

or if he is jealous and suspects her even though she is not impure

So even if she has done NO wrong, there is no proof, she’s still treated as if she’s guilty. Due to his insecurities. And if the wife suspects he has been unfaithful? What course of action is she allowed?

]]>