Pandagon has an illuminating post up about feminism and porn.

It’s true porn reinforces misogynist attitudes, but it’s hardly the cause and it’s probably undeserving of the reputation many anti-porn feminists give it as such a big instigator of violence against women. As Jensen noted in his talk, the group of men who don’t look at porn is “an empty set”, so the one unsettling thing that has to be dealt with is while the average porn consumer may very well be hostile to women and seek that out, a lot of men who are genuinely feminist are jerking off to it, too. So the bit of bait and switch that many people see with the anti-porn contigency is that the reason porn evokes such strong reactions is most of it is so nakedly misogynist and racist, but that doesn’t mean that it’s the cause of those feelings, so the attention paid to it seems a little out of hand.

There’s also the sex-positive argument that porn isn’t inherently hateful, which is true enough and has in fact led to the creation of a teeny subset of the market of more positive porn, but that subset is consumed primarily by women. But what is irrefutable is that the mainstream of porn stubbornly stays focused on racist themes and humiliating and hurting women. All the alternative outlets with teeny tiny audiences won’t change this one fact. And the language of porn being grounded in humiliating women is disputed only if you’re willing to lie to yourself

I absolutely agree with Amanda. 99% of porn is horribly misogynist, but it doesn’t have to be. There is nothing inherently wrong with porn, but almost every minute of it that is produced is utter garbage.

Share and Enjoy:
  • del.icio.us
  • Fark
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • StumbleUpon